Dowser is welcoming new writers/contributors; please send us a note at with a writing sample.

Scaling Social Impact in Six Steps

   /   Jun 29th, 2012News, Uncategorized

The recent Social Impact Exchange conference discussed one of the most difficult aspects of running a nonprofit organization: the decision of how, and when, to grow.  How does an organization decide to go from being a community-centered group to a national network?  How should organizations think about collaborating with others?  When does it make sense for nonprofits to engage with policymakers and try to reform the systems in which they operate?  When should an organization stay put?

The conference, which took place over two days in New York City, featured an impressive group of speakers, participants, and collaborators.  Several nonprofits discussed their methods of growth, which ranged from working with local governments to pursuing cross-sector partnerships.  Philanthropists, foundations, and other funders discussed what they seek when they fund a growing NGO.  Academics spoke of trends they have seen in the space over time.

Here are a few of the key takeaways from the conference:

Scaling up does not necessarily mean replication.  There are many ways an organization can grow, many of which go well beyond replicating its programs.  A music education program in South Carolina can consider replicating its success in Minnesota.  Alternatively, it may decide that there are other, more effective, uses of its resources.  It could work with South Carolina’s Department of Education to get music education into public schools.  It could partner with a consortium of community colleges.  It could begin offering music classes online.  The possibilities are endless.

Invest in infrastructure and capacity.  Many nonprofits have the tendency to not use funding to invest in the organization.  If a nonprofit wants to be successful in the long run, it needs to invest in the necessary infrastructure, including the right people, technology, and processes.  David Bornstein, in this week’s Fixes column, referred to this as the distinction between “buying” and “building.”  Think of it as the difference between paying for a single ambulance ride and putting a down payment on a vehicle.  The former, which is more common in the nonprofit world, looks to “buy” individual services for beneficiaries, often as cheaply as possible.  The latter, meanwhile, aims to “build” a long-lasting enterprise.  Organizations and funders that focus on buying end up looking for short-term successes, while builders are often able to grow more sustainably.

“A bad system will always trump a good program.”  This quote is from keynote speaker Patrick McCarthy, President and CEO of the Annie E. Casey Foundation.  His organization, which supports disadvantaged children in the United States, realized that its impact would be limited until it engaged directly with the nation’s criminal justice and juvenile detention systems.  McCarthy discussed the importance of looking for the key “levers” that keep a system from functioning smoothly and, when appropriate, fighting to change them.

You don’t have to collaborate with everyone.  In today’s world of “strategic partnerships” and “collective impact,” many organizations think they need to partner with as many groups as possible to be successful.  However, as Dinah Waldsmith Dittman of Kaiser Permanente warned, “Collaboration is not a hammer, and not everything’s a nail.”  Successful growth depends not on the quantity but on the quality of partnerships.

Devote resources to coordination.  When an organization does decide to partner to grow, it should do so thoughtfully.  This means setting time aside to agree on the partnership’s vision and goals, deciding in advance each party’s role in the partnership, giving someone the task of coordinating between partners, and being transparent about reaching milestones.  This can, according to FSG’s John Kania, mean the difference between success and failure of a collaboration.

Rome was not built in a day.  Scaling up takes an enormous amount of patience and time.  It’s a messy process, said many speakers, and it doesn’t always turn out the way an organization initially envisions.  As long as an organization has a good team working together to realize a common mission, and as long as it’s comfortable making adjustments along the way, it should be just fine.

9 Responses

  1. hosana says:

    Thanks for sharing these interesting perspectives and experiences. In my context non-profit organizations often grow without any deliberate plan…it could easily happen if they get more funding. That in some cases mean expansion of program without simultaneously considering growth in efficiency of system (IT, communications…), staffing…etc. I am not generalizing but many non-profits tend to get dysfunctional with such growth.

  2. [...] to be more socially oriented in order to form beneficial partnerships with other institutions 5. Scaling Social Impact in Six Steps -  nonprofits, social entrepreneurs, and philanthropists alike discuss critical questions for [...]

  3. [...] A blog post by Sarika Bansal at highlights key takeaways from the conference, “Scaling Social Impact in Six Steps.” [...]

  4. sikandar ali babar says:

    Thanks for sharing knowledge and i hopes in future these types of up dates sending us

  5. Curing techniques of ancient civilizations
    It’s not necessary to describe the Finish spa too much as its function is known widely and if someone needs to find out more information it can be found on the internet. The Indian spa, which is being used much less frequently, is also described in detail on the internet, but its main purpose is hidden in the ancient history.
    The heat needed in the Finish spa is provided via various fire-places or electric heaters. In case of the Indian spa the contact of the persons with the fire is not used but the heat is gained from stones placed in the fireplace that is located outside of the spa area. The heated stones are carried inside the tent, where the spa is located, in the quantity of the various types of stones needed.
    Further, everything works in a way that the contact of the charge of the human body with that of the very hot stones forms one common charge where equalisation of the energetic potentials is reached and at the same time the chemical properties of the materials the stones are made from are being transferred. This leads not only to the increase of the capacity of the cellular membranes but also to the regain of missing minerals. The spa was usually built in an energetic place, which was determined by a sacred leader. The negative contact of the charge of the fire with that of the human body could be understood in the way that its great energetic inertia hinders regulation.
    The eventual doubts about the thoughts that some sacred leader could know some information that is unknown by current science can be cleared by the fact that ancient cultures used to use energy (static charge) of water streams, which is not being studied anywhere by current science.
    Setting the optimal value of charge of the human body is not needed only in case of the Indian sauna but we meet this in many other examples in history. In my article called ‘The pond in Jerusalem’, which could be found at, the regulation of the charge of water is described in detail. We just don’t know how the sacred leader got to know the fact that the ‘angel has adjusted the water’ so that its energetic value would have almost universal curing effect. The unknown helpful tool that was used by the sacred leader to determine this could have been just a normal natural device that was able to determine the value of the charge (static charge) of the water.

    It is probable that it could have been a dowsing rod, which could be used to identify the size of aura of the rock, which accumulates the charge of the water stream in its matter. There are many groups that are interested in the research of dowsing rods and they have a lot of experience. Therefore I think that these groups could find an answer to this problem. By this I would like to invite the specialists in Dowsing to join this research.
    All the answers to the eventual questions can be find on my website stated above where there is a detailed description of a multi-year research. I thank everyone in advance for any possible participation in the research.
    Miroslav Provod

  6. Doug says:

    The notions focus, building infrastructure and capacity, then scaling something unique make so much more sense than just “buying individual services for beneficiaries”.

  7. test site says:

    I’m also commenting to let you know of the magnificent discovery my friend’s princess enjoyed viewing the blog. She figured out a wide variety of pieces, including what it’s like to possess a very effective helping mindset to let certain people effortlessly fully grasp some hard to do subject matter. You undoubtedly did more than readers’ desires. Thank you for churning out these warm and friendly, healthy, educational and as well as fun guidance on your topic to Lizeth.

  8. BidNinja says:

    This website just made my week! I have been looking around for details on this. I’m glad now that I ran across this webpage. Woohoo!

  9. I love the tips you have shared about Scaling Social Impact. This is quite very helpful for us.